🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and potential offenders appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of headlights or flashlights as the police arrive, their expressions and tones expressing wariness or fear or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like remarkable hesitation – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the streaming service true-crime documentary American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of Ajike Owens in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Investigation and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie constructs its narrative with the body cam footage generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – introduced by 911 audio material of Lorincz contacting authorities in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really imply anything too complicated about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an example of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking bloodshed. But the reality of firearm possession and the constitutional right (that historic American constitutional privilege that a deceased pundit famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Gun Culture

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel astonished at how little interest the officers took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what seemed to her local residents a very long time, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally formally arrested in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A very sombre portrayal of American crime and punishment.